<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Days That Will Live In Lunacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/</link>
	<description>Now with 500% more elegant florishes, bitches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loopylines.com/?p=1425#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>When it comes to pickup trucks, I just have never understood anything but a full sized pickup truck. All trucks get bad gas mileage and small and midsized trucks seem to, for the most part get just as bad mileage as a full size. So if it&#039;s MPG you are concerned about, why bother with a small truck? You just can&#039;t do with a small truck what you can do with a full sized truck. Ford and GM&#039;s smaller trucks are crap but the full size Ford and GM truck offerings are by far the best available. I prefer the looks of Sierra and Silverado. Toyota can&#039;t touch Ford or GM full sized trucks and don&#039;t even bother mentioning Nissan. Chysler has looks going for them but then there&#039;s the question of the viability of the company. 

Don&#039;t worry about GM or Ford. Neither of them are going to go away and if may hazard a guess, I bet Chrysler is here for years to come as well.

Regardless, the piece was an entertaining read. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to pickup trucks, I just have never understood anything but a full sized pickup truck. All trucks get bad gas mileage and small and midsized trucks seem to, for the most part get just as bad mileage as a full size. So if it&#8217;s MPG you are concerned about, why bother with a small truck? You just can&#8217;t do with a small truck what you can do with a full sized truck. Ford and GM&#8217;s smaller trucks are crap but the full size Ford and GM truck offerings are by far the best available. I prefer the looks of Sierra and Silverado. Toyota can&#8217;t touch Ford or GM full sized trucks and don&#8217;t even bother mentioning Nissan. Chysler has looks going for them but then there&#8217;s the question of the viability of the company. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry about GM or Ford. Neither of them are going to go away and if may hazard a guess, I bet Chrysler is here for years to come as well.</p>
<p>Regardless, the piece was an entertaining read. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theluigiian</title>
		<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator>theluigiian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loopylines.com/?p=1425#comment-3803</guid>
		<description>Umm... that was a bit... Sorry about that. I got  a little carried away there, talking about trucks. Glad you got a laugh out of the article though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; that was a bit&#8230; Sorry about that. I got  a little carried away there, talking about trucks. Glad you got a laugh out of the article though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theluigiian</title>
		<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>theluigiian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loopylines.com/?p=1425#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Face it, Toyota does not now nor will they ever know how to build a truck unless you think ugly camshaft breaking brake line cutting, frame flexing deathtraps are good things.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, that&#039;s just the access cab version. I will admit I do tend towards the F-150 more than the Tundras and Titans, but the Tacoma has its positives and the Frontier is clearly a better overall machine than the forgotten Ranger/Colorado entries. I&#039;m interested in the A-BAT Toyota came up with in Detroit too, simply because it would be fuel-efficient, but I&#039;m conflicted because I think it&#039;s ugly and doesn&#039;t have the utility I need.

The current truck market sucks. Every truck right now is either a gas-guzzling beast of a thing or junky subpar equipment unfit for serious usage. There&#039;s really no middle ground, and a serious compact pickup that has both versatility and quality built in is DOA. Which leaves me with the Tacoma, an ugly little thing with little to no utility in the backseats, but at least it&#039;s (theoretically) reliable and useful transportation.

Again, I say: First guys that make a decent vehicle that can tow 3,000 pounds, haul four guys, give enough room to carry a 4x8 sheet of plywood, and do it with good fuel economy and allow me to park the resulting thing in my garage gets my money. I may think Toyotas are ugly, but the A-BAT and Tacoma are the only ones coming close.

And then the Colorado crewcab four-banger combo, of course, but with GM&#039;s financial situation I find that to be a somewhat iffy vehicle to actually consider purchasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Face it, Toyota does not now nor will they ever know how to build a truck unless you think ugly camshaft breaking brake line cutting, frame flexing deathtraps are good things.</i></p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s just the access cab version. I will admit I do tend towards the F-150 more than the Tundras and Titans, but the Tacoma has its positives and the Frontier is clearly a better overall machine than the forgotten Ranger/Colorado entries. I&#8217;m interested in the A-BAT Toyota came up with in Detroit too, simply because it would be fuel-efficient, but I&#8217;m conflicted because I think it&#8217;s ugly and doesn&#8217;t have the utility I need.</p>
<p>The current truck market sucks. Every truck right now is either a gas-guzzling beast of a thing or junky subpar equipment unfit for serious usage. There&#8217;s really no middle ground, and a serious compact pickup that has both versatility and quality built in is DOA. Which leaves me with the Tacoma, an ugly little thing with little to no utility in the backseats, but at least it&#8217;s (theoretically) reliable and useful transportation.</p>
<p>Again, I say: First guys that make a decent vehicle that can tow 3,000 pounds, haul four guys, give enough room to carry a 4&#215;8 sheet of plywood, and do it with good fuel economy and allow me to park the resulting thing in my garage gets my money. I may think Toyotas are ugly, but the A-BAT and Tacoma are the only ones coming close.</p>
<p>And then the Colorado crewcab four-banger combo, of course, but with GM&#8217;s financial situation I find that to be a somewhat iffy vehicle to actually consider purchasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loopylines.com/?p=1425#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>Oh man, you&#039;d better believe it&#039;s wrong. I nearly died laughing reading this piece. But there was one break in the levity, the Toyota seat. What a joke, and not the funny kind of joke. Face it, Toyota does not now nor will they ever know how to build a truck unless you think ugly camshaft breaking brake line cutting, frame flexing deathtraps are good things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, you&#8217;d better believe it&#8217;s wrong. I nearly died laughing reading this piece. But there was one break in the levity, the Toyota seat. What a joke, and not the funny kind of joke. Face it, Toyota does not now nor will they ever know how to build a truck unless you think ugly camshaft breaking brake line cutting, frame flexing deathtraps are good things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Crosby</title>
		<link>http://loopylines.com/2009/01/22/days-that-will-live-in-lunacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loopylines.com/?p=1425#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>There are so many things wrong with this I couldn&#039;t begin to point them out without noticing something else jumping out at me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many things wrong with this I couldn&#8217;t begin to point them out without noticing something else jumping out at me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
